In the Department of Music, music historians, music theorists, and ethnomusicologists work and research hand in hand with psychologists, sociologists, and neuroscientists in order to jointly develop a transdisciplinary aesthetics of music in which all relevant approaches and methods are productively intertwined. The intention is to gain a better understanding of the specific field of experience and practice that humans have created for themselves with music and how they make use of it.
Our research questions address key topics in philosophical aesthetics like taste, judgment, and particularly, aesthetic experience. We investigate these by orienting ourselves with a conceptual framework that considers the aesthetic experience of music to be the result of the coincidence in time and space of three meta-factors: a person, a sequence of sounds, and a situational and discursive frame (“frame” in the sense of Erving Goffman). Each of these has specific characteristics and manifestations that, in interplay with each other, give rise to a specific aesthetic experience.
We examine the aesthetic experience of music...
...and its factors using a full range of empirical methods: we gather self-reported information in the form of qualitative interviews and questionnaires with open-ended and closed-ended questions, we observe and analyze behavior—again, qualitatively and quantitatively, and we measure the physiological and neural correlates of listening to music.
The reception situations we examine include not only experiments in typical laboratory settings, but also semi-realistic settings in our ArtLab as well as real everyday experiences. All types of music and all ways of handling music (“musicking,” to use Christopher Small’s term) hold interest for us. It is particularly important to us to expand empirical music aesthetics to explore repertoires, practices, and discourses of non-Western cultures. Therefore, we also work comparatively across cultures and conduct studies in other countries and continents. Here, as well as in our research on the aesthetic experience in realistic live contexts (such as at a concert or a religious service), our pursuit of specific research questions is always linked with development of methods.
Intentionally, we conduct not only empirical, but also historical and theoretical research; after all, music, musicking practices, and related norms are first of all socioculturally determined and historically mutable phenomena.
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, ArtLab Foyer
Whether the aesthetic experience of music can be meaningfully measured at all—and if so, how—and what type of knowledge is gained through such measurements, is perhaps the most controversial question in empirical aesthetics. It seems that an almost insurmountable gap arises between philosophical concepts and literary or autobiographical descriptions of aesthetic experiences on the one hand and typical empirical measurements on the other.
While existing research, particularly in music psychology, has primarily investigated the combined effect of the individual’s and the stimulus features to better understand evaluative, emotional, or behavioral responses to music, we are also investigating the influences of frames.
Empirical studies on cultural artifacts and practices like music can profit enormeously from a sound historical knowledge on music, its practices, aesthetics and discourses. Therefore, we not only deal with relevant historical aspects in a number of single studies, but have also started two series of long-term projects.
The observation that one and the same aesthetic object is valued differently by different people was already made and discussed in antiquity, as well as the observation that people differ in regard to their more or less stable preferences for or aversions to aesthetic objects and object classes.
How do children learn to sing melodies and produce rhythms? How do they develop musical taste? How do they learn to understand and use music in various situations? Can we boost spontaneous, implicit musical learning with educational interventions?
van Rijn, P., & Larrouy-Maestri, P. (2023). Modelling individual and cross-cultural
variation in the mapping of emotions to speech prosody. Nature Human Behaviour. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01505-5.
Trenado, C., Boschheidgen, M., N’Diaye, K., Schnitzler, A., Mallet, L., & Wojtecki, L. (2023).
No effect of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on metacognition in Parkinson’s disease. Scientific
Reports,13: 10. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26980-8.
Wörner, F., & Wald-Fuhrmann, M. (
Pearson, L. (2022). A social aesthetics and ethics of imperfection: Insights from Karnatak
Music, Jazz and free improvisation. In P. Cheyne (
Wald-Fuhrmann, M. (2022). Coronamusic(king):Types, repertoires, consolatory function.
In M. Agamennone, D. Palma, & G. Sarno (
Fink, L., Durojaye, C., Roeske, T. C., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., & Larrouy-Maestri, P. (2022).
The Dùndún Drum helps us understand how we process speech and music. Frontiers for Young Minds,10: 755390. doi:10.3389/frym.2022.755390.
Jakubowski, K., Polak, R., Rocamora, M., Jure, L., & Jacoby, N. (2022). Aesthetics
of musical timing: Culture and expertise affect preferences for isochrony but not synchrony. Cognition,227: 105205. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105205.
Frischen, U., Degé, F., & Schwarzer, G. (2022). The relation between rhythm processing
and cognitive abilities during child development: The role of prediction. Frontiers in Psychology,13: 920513. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920513.
Bär, C. (2022). Urbanes Place-Making und Sprechen über Musik. In B. Busse, & I.
H. Warnke (
- Ackermann, Taren
- Bär, Christian
- Blohm, Stefan
- Boenneke, Sven
- Bruder, Camila
- Buren, Verena
- Czepiel, Anna
- Degé, Franziska
- Durojaye, Cecilia
- Elvers, Paul
- Fayn, Kirill
- Fink, Lea
- Fink, Lauren
- Fischinger, Timo
- Franz, Isabelle
- Gernandt, Emily
- Greb, Fabian
- Grimm, Hartmut †
- Grüny, Christian
- Haider, Thomas
- Heimann, Katrin
- Henschke, Sebastian †
- Kaufmann, Michaela
- Kentner, Gerrit
- Knoop, Christine A.
- Kudakov, Nikita
- Lange, Elke B.
- Larrouy-Maestri, Pauline
- Mencke, Iris
- Merrill, Julia
- Mieles, Myriam
- Modestini, Pietro
- Omigie, Diana
- Orgs, Guido
- Pearson, Lara
- Pöhls, Victoria
- Polak, Rainer
- Roeske, Tina
- Ruccius, Alexis
- Saxena, Shreshth
- Scharinger, Mathias
- Schindler, Ines
- Seibert, Christoph
- Siebrasse, Anne
- Thissen, Birte
- Toelle, Jutta
- Trenado, Carlos
- Tuchynska, Tetiana
- van Dyck-Hemming, Annette
- Vroegh, Thijs
- Wagner, Valentin
- Wald-Fuhrmann, Melanie
- Wiesecke, Janine
- Will, Johanna
- Willemsen, Steven
- Wörner, Felix
- Yalin, Silke
- Zschauer, Anna
Musikdiskurse. Sprachliche Muster, Dichte, Diversität im Sound populärer Musikrezensionen, Dissertation (Universität Bremen)
Appreciating Musical Uncertainty – Characterizing the Cognitive, Neural and Affective Correlates of New Music, Dissertation (Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main)
"Disliked Music". Merkmale, Gründe und Funktionen abgelehnter Musik. Dissertation (Universität Kassel)
Stimmen – schön schrecklich oder schrecklich schön? Beschreibung, Bewertung und Wirkung des vokalen Ausdrucks in der Musik, Habilitation Musikwissenschaft (Universität Kassel)
The pleasures of getting involved into the music: Absorption, and its role in the aesthetic appreciation of musik, Dissertation (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main)
Determinants of Music-selection Behaviour: Development of a Model, Dissertation (Technische Universität Berlin)
Music listening as self-enhancement: How empowering music affects self-esteem, Dissertation (Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main)
Musik und Affektivität: Systemtheoretische Perspektiven für eine transdisziplinäre Musikforschung, Dissertation (Hochschule für Musik Karlsruhe)
Veröffentlicht als: Seibert, C. (2016): Musik und Affektivität: Systemtheoretische Perspektiven für eine transdisziplinäre Musikforschung. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.